Why Have Admen Lost Their Mojo?
The advertising business used to be the high-pressure playground of visionaries and scoundrels. Where’d they all go?

“There aren’t enough personalities in the business anymore,” said adman Richard Kirshenbaum, who founded Kirshenbaum Bond + Partners with his former J. Walter Thompson co-worker Jonathan Bond in 1987, when he was 26. He was speaking as part of a panel on how to start your own ad agency, in the Time-Life Building, as part of Advertising Week 2007. The assembled hopefuls twittered.
“Everything’s just become too vanilla,” he continued. The unspoken assumption, of course, was that Mr. Kirshenbaum was one of the last true badasses in a business that has become neutered in the last 10 years.
Mr. Kirshenbaum, whom Us Weekly recently named one of New York’s 25 most stylish people, was wearing a navy blue suit with lavender pinstripes—bespoke, as most of his suits are—and a matching lavender pocket square and rather tight white shirt. His mane of blond hair was highlighted; he had stubble on his cheeks and just a hint of a goatee; a pair of glasses hung casually at his chest. The effect was 21st-century Austin Powers meets David Beckham. (Mr. Kirshenbaum reportedly once referred to himself as “the greatest metrosexual of all time, aside from David Beckham.”)
He spoke about an intern of his who came to work wearing a paper bag on his head, with holes poked out for eyes. This, he told the crowd approvingly, was an example of how advertising agencies need to allow creative people to just do their thing.
Later, Mr. Kirshenbaum elaborated via telephone. “The business has gotten a bit more bland,” he sighed. “There aren’t as many personalities as when I went into the business. There were different types of agencies, and each one was representative of the founder.”
But so what? Is it so terrible that the age when, as the AMC series Mad Men—which, in its first season, has followed the fortunes of a fictional ad agency called Sterling Cooper in 1960—shows us, admen were larger-than-life figures, is over? That a copywriter is now likely to get a blank stare when he proudly relays the tag line that he came up with to sell dishwasher detergent or convertibles or cold medicine? Eager college graduates used to move to New York to seek their fame and fortune in the glass and steel skyscrapers on Madison Avenue; advertising was seen as a sexy industry that offered the perfect combination of business and creative skills, and attracted thousands of failed novelists, hobbyist painters, moonlighting poets. They were attracted by men like David Ogilvy, who once said in his trademark Scottish brogue, “If you can’t advertise yourself, what hope have you of being able to advertise anything else?” He was wearing a kilt and a cravat at the time; when he retired, he moved to a 60-room castle in the south of France.
The era portrayed by Mad Men (which AMC just renewed for a second season) is an alluring one: three-martini (sometimes four- or five-) lunches, smoking in the offices, lots of extramarital affairs. (Of course, it was an alluring world largely for men; women were almost entirely confined to the typing pool and the beds of their bosses.)
“The glory days of advertising just aren’t around anymore,” sighed a 28-year-old copywriter at a large agency. “The multimillion dollar account and cocaine in the boardrooms are fewer and farther between. And now, you can’t ethically have an expense account and take clients on crazy vacation shoots.” Tant pis, mon chou! “It’s not to say it’s without its perks or glamour, but the persona of the power suit is playing for much lower stakes now, and the unchecked excess of that whole industry is such that it’s much more regulated than it used to be.”
That also might be because there’s simply less money floating around advertising today. The ad sharpies in Mad Men think nothing of taking clients to 21 and Toots Shor’s, skipping out for an afternoon romp with their mistresses, or—in one difference that undoubtedly resonated—buying a co-op at 83rd and Park as a junior account executive. (“It’s $32,000, but the agent thinks we can get it for $30,” the man’s wife tells him excitedly.) All the money was largely due to the industry’s fee structure, which paid agencies a 15 percent commission on whatever its clients’ media spending was.
“If a client spent $100 million on media costs, the agency used to get $15 million,” said Nina DiSesa, chairman of McCann Erickson’s New York office. “A lot of money was going around in those days! Today, the cost of doing business may be the same, but we don’t entertain the same. The relationship with the client is not based on entertainment; we don’t go out drinking. People don’t have time for that now, because when a campaign fails, you get fired.”
“When I first started, it was pretty decadent—people working drunk and everything—but it’s definitely lessened over the years. The whole decadence thing in advertising is kind of looked down upon,” said Mark Duffy, a copywriter who’s been in the business for nearly 20 years and writes the Copyranter blog.
At the same time, the types of clients who want a large agency to handle their advertising have changed. On Mad Men, Sterling Cooper competes for business from Bethlehem Steel and Richard Nixon; today, some of the biggest money in advertising comes from pharmaceuticals, which don’t offer the same cachet. Try telling the girl you just met at Soho House that you work on the Cialis campaign. Next Page >




















Interesting article...makes the ad industry look really crazy!
It is amazing that it takes an article like this to remind us of the passage of time. I was a successful commerical actor in the golden age of AdBiz. Money flowed like water..and residuals did as well. My how times have changed...not necessarly for the better or the worse..just for the change...
It is amazing that it takes an article like this to remind us of the passage of time. I was a successful commerical actor in the golden age of AdBiz. Money flowed like water..and residuals did as well. My how times have changed...not necessarly for the better or the worse..just for the change...
I completely agree with the comment about agencies having lost their mojo. Our business today isn't filled with many visionaries or scoundrels. While we can do without the scoundrels we can't do without the visionaries. In the movie 'The Sixth Sense' the little boy said: "I see dead people"
The majority of today's agencies all only carry the initials
of the now dead entrepeneurs and visionaries. No wonder why agencies are dying.
I wouldn't agree that advertising is being replaced by PR. The fact that you're using the bed-head dolt from The Hills to make the case is pretty thin.
There is a slim chance that anyone who's remotely creative -- either from the art or writing side -- would be interested, much less happy, in a career in PR. It's the hackiest, lamest job in the world (see: the dolt Heidi Montag). The gig requires a lobotomy, the ability to blow smoke up people's asses, and a talent for badgering journalists with smarmy pitches.
Advertising is still a great way to make a living if you're artistically inclined and it's still infinitely more crazy than just about any other job for people who want to be creative at work. Clients still spend lavishly on shoots, and per diems are still high enough on location that you can get you and everybody to your left at the bar totally wasted night after night.
The only difference is that today you must understand and create for the online universe, and the supposedly edgy world of agencies -- the big behemoths that all made their fortunes on the 30-second spot -- are scared shitless because they're all too set in their ways to figure out the new space or find innovative ways to lead their clients into it.
Anyway, I'm happy to hear that Kirshenbaum works hard on his hair, but I haven't seen anything remotely interesting from his agency in years. Maybe he's been too busy figuring out a way to pay that 10 grand he (allegedly) wasted down in the Bahamas (wow, what a crazy vacation destination!) That wi-fi incident isn't iconoclasm; it's stupidity. Maybe today's ad people are just smart enough to know the difference.
Having started my advertising agency career at DDB in 1963, I find Mad Men interesting, amusing, and totally false. Have any of the shows writers or consultants worked in the biz back in the early 1960's during the begining of the Creative Revolution, started by Bill Bernbach at DDB? I strongly doubt it.
As for personalities, come on, Jerry Della Femina, Donnie Deutsch, certainly fill the bill. Besides David Ogilvy and Bill Bernbach, there were very few other notable high profile ad execs in the '60, think snoozers Dan Seymour (JWT), Arthur Fatt (Grey), Marion Harper (Interpublic). Bob Jacoby (Ted Bates) jumped into the limelight when he negotaited the sale of Bates to Saatchi & Saatchi and, after falling out with S&S, returned to the agency for his portrait. But his fame had nothing to do with advertising creativity.
"But: 'It’s one thing to sip champagne next to whomever at a gala,' said the 25-year-old former account exec. 'It’s another thing when you can’t pay your rent.'"
Hahahahahahaha! NOTHING HAS CHANGED!!! When I worked at Grey-LA in the late 70's and early 80's, it was said (and also of Grey-NY), "Grey is a great place to work if your parents can afford to send you there."
I couldn't afford rent or food but I had great lunches and dinners at fabulous restaurants, network events at the Jonathan Club at the Beach, celeb sightings in Beverly Hills and Hollywood, etc., so it didn't matter.
Would anyone care if 12 advertising executives were placed on the cover of Time today?
Does anyone care what goes on the cover of time period?
Perhaps if the baby boomers of today's ad industry would step down, stop reminiscing about the past, and let fresh talent present & pitch there would be better creative. Instead you hear whiney upper execs wondering what went wrong. Why clients are always playing it safe? Why no one can just sell it in? Then they blame their creative department because there are no personalities? Look around! Keeping all of the dinosaurs of yesterday who only think in 30 second spots isn't helping out any full service agency. It is no wonder to me there are more boutique ad agencies with larger profit percentages then ever. It is also no wonder that better talent are applying to work in PR, where at very least they will travel and be heard for the same pitiful salary.
Advertising Creatives don't have time for Mojo when they're spending 17 hours a day creating global 360 branding campaigns for a fraction of what they used to make, financially.
Not to mention all the other unnecessary job titles that have popped up in the industry, which just causes more bloat (and less money all around), which takes away from the true talent - the Creatives and the Account men and women who can sell anything in.
Otherwise, the perks are still ok and probably the only think keeping the talent there. Lose more of that and you'll see overall quality drop. Also, if you have a passion for what you do, it's a great job.
its a totally business today vs. 30 years ago. first, mass audiences are dead. second, agencies have less overall clout with clients...they are much less likely to be "partners" and much more likely to have a supplier-type relationship. its far less fun for the agency. things are split up...media here, creative there, pr and promotion in different places. marketing people at clients have much more information and they dole it out to agencies. conversely, technology has allowed freelancers and smaller operators to compete on a project basis and talented creatives don't need the large agency environment.
They're still there. There are just a lot fewer of them. But if you look at the top 5 or 10 hottest creative shops, you'll find them.
Women in advertising sleeping to the top? Now, what would Nina DiSesa know about that?
Working in this biz since '78, what's really missing for me is not only the fun, but that spirit of creative competition that used to exist- people running back and forth from each other's offices jealous of what someone just came up with and dying to top it. As far as the fun factor, now it seems to come in short bursts, then it's back to the spiritless grind.
Linked from my blog on photography and other such non topics to yours. A fair amount of my colleagues read it and continue to believe that what matters most is creativity and marketing. Sure it counts for much, but fear and safety runs the biz. Those of us who are most successful in advertising photography are the ones who manage to most successfully sell themselves as "the safer alternative" to the visionaries. Right now it's better to be second best than an innovator in the field.
That also might be because there’s simply less money floating around advertising today.
check your facts. Jon bond never worked one day at JWT nor any other advertising agency of note before he started this business. The two met through Bond's starter wife who he promptly dumped when she gave birth to their autistic son. Nice people in this business.
Replica Watches,Fake Watches,Replica Watch,Fake Watch,Wholesale Watches,Wholesale Replica Watches,Jewelry Watches,Replica Jewelry Watches.